'putting more people Pandora Bracelets UK on the Titanic' 'putting more people on the Titanic' Cnn's bryan koenig California(Msnbc)Red state blue state governors rick perry and martin o'malley debated job creation and medical related on wednesday, with perry equating adding visitors to medicaid via obamacare with"Putting tens of thousands on the titanic knowing how it will now turn out, Both men can be contenders for the white house in 2016 and on cnn's"Crossfire, they aired out some of the key issues that are likely to define a campaign should they run. Perry has been noncommittal about his plans to pursue the republican nomination for a second time after the texas governor's campaign imploded yr after.He showed no hesitation of 2012 on wednesday night however, hammering home points about texas job creation through limited navy policies. Ex advisers hint at future as perry broadcast exit as governor When challenged on the disproportionately large number of minimum wage jobs created in texas along with the large number of texans without medical cover, perry stuck to his babbling points. "We're about providing people with freedom, perry claims, the freedom to have a job and the freedom to choose whether have health insurance. Perry continually cited the companies that have set Pandora Glass Beads up shop in texas, introducing amazon, bebo and toyota. "They didn't come there if they were worried if there was not going to be a skilled workforce, or individuals were going to have healthcare, perry asserted. Perry and o'malley clashed most forcefully over jobs, mainly spurred by perry's media Cheap Pandora Bracelets Sale outreach aimed at poaching maryland businesses. In respond to texas' business friendly environment, o'malley fell back on job creation language coined by president obama. Rather of texas policies that seem to disproportionately create minimum wage jobs, maryland has chosen to spotlight"Building an economy from the center out, o'malley told me, via the likes of improving education. 2016 look:O'malley nh bound O'malley, a trustworthy democra suitablet, told perry that mississippi is"Not an economy that is actually lifting up the middle-Class, The two came at their different positions with radically Pandora Beads:http://www.afour.co.uk/ different statistics and viewpoints. O'malley spoke of talent creation and entrepreneurship encouraged in maryland while perry trumpeted improving education standards and different options texans have for healthcare, although he didn't expand upon. Texas and maryland have also taken polar opposite views on the guidelines of the affordable care act, obama's signature legislative achievement also known as obamacare. O'malley continues to hold up maryland's early adoption of obamacare while perry has refused federal money to expand medicaid via the healthcare law. Perry argued that expanding medicaid and embracing obamacare would in the end end up costing texas $100 billion. Storing"Tens of thousands individuals on a system that is broken, perry said of adding them to low income health programs, is quite like"Putting tens of thousands on the titanic knowing how rrt's going to turn out, In return, o'malley argued that the flexibleness of the obamacare healthcare exchanges that get underway next month, long lasting inevitable hiccups in the system, will offer maryland workers a competitive advantage allowing them to move from job to job without worrying about losing their health care. The gop does want healthcare for the uninsured and their proposal is to do just that without dragging with the holistic parts of it down.The gop is against the current obamacare since it is so damaging to the economy and to the middle class.We will have just as associated with uninsured under obamacare because the rates have sky rocketed(Mine had gone up 46%)And i had to modify plans and doctors.Point obama said wouldn't happen.Possibly even, one of the procedures allows for those making $20, 000 30, 000 to get financial assistance to help pay for their insurance.That same provision does not apply to any children and those in that salary range will be required by law to pay full price coverage for their kids through their employers.At my company that is about $600 a month and i doubt people in that salary range are able to it.And simply, that is only a symptom.It is a waste that will do more damage than good. Why don't the unions want this law that they fought so challenging to get passed?Is there a democrat out there that wants to respond to that? The answer to your question is the those who been telling you the unions don't want the law are lying to you.Google view"Afl cio houston convention, you will discover a link to the afl cio convention in los angeles in 2013(Just a week ago).Go to the button for resolutions and amendments and you can discover a link to"Afl cio convention agreement on the affordable care act"Which shows the union wants some changes like stronger things for employers to cover employees but they fully support the law.